You will learn that from the recent cases, courts actually maintained a ban on businesses contributing unlimited funds to campaigns. It is certain that about 90% of Americans want the role of money in politics to be checked. This is what has made so many people to eagerly wait for the ruling so as to know what role the corporates will take in financing politics in future. It is evident that not all will appreciate the decision that the Supreme Court has chosen to go for. They declined to overturn the ban on campaign finance. You will get to understand more about this particular ruling as you keep on reading.
You need to understand that nothing really happened in court. Even without taking into account the challenges in the prevailing campaign finance laws, the Supreme Court chose to go with it. This means that corporates will not be allowed to donate any money to both campaigns and candidates. This decision has resulted in curtailing the ballooning role of corporates in the political field. You will find that in previous instances, corporates has the room to donate to campaign kitties from time to time. This would have been allowed in case the money was not directly associated to particular individuals. It is imperative to mention that this case was actually presented by two companies that hail from Massachusetts. This case was purposed to enhance financial responsibility and even economic opportunities. It will actually be more prudent for you to consider a good lawyer in case of such a big case.
Seek to ensure that you are familiarized with the legal argument in this case. You will find that these companies argued that the first amendment rights of companies was barely being observed. The argument was based on the fact that political donations were components of freedom of speech. They also invoked the constitution which seeks to protect every individual equally. You will find that non-profit as well as charity organizations are barely given the room to donate to these political campaigns. This goes ahead to show that the treatment offered right here tend to be discriminatory. This certainly goes against what the dictates of the constitution are.
It is necessary to mention that the ruling of the High Court was upheld. This ruling claimed that corporates are not allowed to donate money to political campaigns. This is brought about by the ease of causing corruption in politics. It is for this reason that no political candidate will be at liberty to receive any donation from corporations.